1. Asian P, Kuo RL, Hazel K, Babayan RK, Preminger GM. Advances in digital imaging during endoscopic surgery. J Endourol 1999; 13: 251-255.

2. Preminger GM. Video imaging and documentation. In: Smith AD, Badlani GH, Bagley DH, et al., eds. Smith's Textbook of Endourology. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing, Inc., 1996.

3. Auge BK, Preminger GM. Digital Cameras and Documentation in Urologic Practice. AUA Update Series 2002; Volume XXI.

4. Schurr MO, Kunert W, Arezzo A, Buess G. The role and future of endoscopic imaging systems. Endoscopy 1999; 31: 557-562.

5. Hanna G, Cuschieri A. Image display technology and image processing. World J Surg 2001; 25:1419-1427.

6. Kuo RL, Preminger GM. Current urologic applications of digital imaging. J Endourol 2001; 15:53-57.

7. Weinberg DS. Digital imaging as a teaching tool for pathologists. Clin Lab Med 17:229-244.

8. Kuo RL, Delvecchio FC, Babayan RK, Preminger GM. Telemedicine: recent developments and future applications. J Endourol 2001; 15:63-66.

9. Berci G, Wren SM, Stain SC, Peters J, Paz-Partlow M. Individual assessment of visual perception by surgeons observing the same laparoscopic organs with various imaging systems. Surg Endosc 1995; 9:967-973.

10. Preminger GM, Delvecchio FC, Birnbach JM. Digital image recording: an integral aspect of video endoscopy. Stud Health Technol Inform 1999; 62:268-274.

11. Boppart SA, Deutsch TF, Rattner DW. Optical imaging technology in minimally invasive surgery. Current status and future directions. Surg Endosc 1999; 13:718-722.

12. Cuschieri A. Technology for minimal access surgery. BMJ 1999; 319:1304.

13. Afane JS, Olweny EO, Bercowsky E, et al. Flexible ureteroscopes: a single center evaluation of the durability and function of the new endoscopes smaller than 9Fr. J Urol 2000; 164:1164-1168.

14. Levisohn PM. Safety and tolerability of topiramate in children. J Child Neurol 2000; 15(suppl 1): S22-S26.

15. Knyrim K, Seidlitz H, Vakil N. Current developments in electronic endoscopy. Endoscopy 1992; 24(suppl 2):502-505.

16. Niwa H, Kawaguchi A, Miyahara T, Koyama H. Clinical use of new video-endoscopes (evis 100 and 200). Endoscopy 1992; 24:222-224.

17. Pelosi MA, Kadar N, Pelosi MA 3rd ed. The electronic video operative laparoscope. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laproscopists 1993; 1:54-57.

18. Fockens P. Future developments in endoscopic imaging. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2002; 16:999-1012.

19. Kuo RL, Aslan P, Dinlenc CZ, et al. Secure transmission of urologic images and records over the Internet. J Endourol 1999; 13:141-146.

20. Kuo RL, Delvecchio FC, Preminger GM. Use of a digital camera in the urologic setting. Urology 1999; 53:613-616.

21. Wurnig PN, Hollaus PH, Wurnig CH, Wolf RK, Ohtsuka T, Pridun NS. A new method for digital video documentation in surgical procedures and minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc 2003; 232-235.

22. Arenson RL, Andriole KP, Avrin DE, Gould RG. Computers in imaging and health care: now and in the future. J Digit Imaging 2000; 13:145-156.

23. Fujino MA, Ikeda M, Yamamoto Y, et al. Development of an integrated filing system for endoscopic images. Endoscopy 1991; 23:11-15.

24. Martinez R, Cole C, Rozenblit J, Cook JF, Chacko AK. Common object request broker architecture (CORBA)-based security services for the virtual radiology environment. J Digit Imaging 2000; 13:59-70.

25. Emam TA, Hanna G, Cuschieri A. Ergonomic principles of task alignment, visual display, and direction of execution of laparoscopic bowel suturing. Surg Endosc 2002; 16:267-271.

26. von Orelli A, Lehareinger Y, Rol P, Niederer P, Doswald D, Felber N. High-definition true-colour television for use in minimally invasive medical procedures. Technol Health Care 1999; 7(1):75-84.

27. van Bergen P, Kunert W, Buess GF. The effect of high-definition imaging on surgical task efficiency in minimally invasive surgery: an experimental comparison between three-dimensional imaging and direct vision through a stereoscopic TEM rectoscope. Surg Endosc 2000; 14:71-74.


29. Durrani AF, Preminger GM. Three-dimensional video imaging for endoscopic surgery. Comput Biol Med 1995; 25:237-247.

30. Tan YH, Preminger GM. Advances in video and imaging in ureteroscopy. Urol Clin North Am 2004; 31:33-42.

31. Herron DM, Lantis JC, Maykel J, Basu C, Schwaitzberg SD. The 3-D monitor and head-mounted display. A quantitative evaluation of advanced laparoscopic viewing technologies. Surg Endosc 1999; 13:751-755.

32. Hofmeister J, Frank TG, Cuschieri A, Wade NJ. Perceptual aspects of two-dimensional and stereoscopic display techniques in endoscopic surgery: review and current problems. Semin Laparosc Surg 2001; 8:12-24.

33. Chang L, Satava RM, Pellegrini CA, Sinanan MN. Robotic surgery: identifying the learning curve through objective measurement of skill. Surg Endosc 2003; 17:1744-1748.

34. Dakin GF, Gagner M. Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems. Surg Endosc 2003; 17:574-579.

35. Renda A, Vallancien G. Principles and advantages of robotics in urologic surgery. Curr Urol Rep 2003; 4:114-118.

36. Kuo RL, Delvecchio FC, Preminger GM. Virtual reality: current urologic applications and future developments. J Endourol 2001; 15:117-122.

37. Preminger GM, Babayan RK, Merril GL, Raju R, Millman A, Merril JR. Virtual reality surgical simulation in endoscopic urologic surgery. Stud Health Technol Inform 1996; 29:157-163.

38. Shah J, Mackay S, Vale J, Darzi A. Simulation in urology—a role for virtual reality? BJU Int 2001; 88:661-665.

39. Matsumoto ED, Hamstra SJ, Radomski SB, Cusimano MD. The effect of bench model fidelity on endourological skills: a randomized controlled study. J Urol 2002; 167:1243-1247.

40. Merril JR, Preminger GM, Babayan RK, Roy RT, Merril GL. Surgical simulation using virtual reality technology: design, implementation and implications. Surg Technol Int 1994; III:53-60.

Jacomides L, Ogan K, Cadeddu JA, Pearle MS. Use of a virtual reality simulator for ureteroscopy training. J Urol 2004; 171:320-323; discussion.

Johnson DB, Kondraske GV, Wilhelm DM, et al. Assessment of basic human performance resources predicts the performance of virtual ureterorenoscopy. J Urol 2004; 171:80-84. Watterson JD, Beiko DT, Kuan JK, Denstedt JD. Randomized prospective blinded study validating acquistion of ureteroscopy skills using computer based virtual reality endourological simulator. J Urol 2002; 168:1928-1932.

Wilhelm DM, Ogan K, Roehrborn CG, Cadeddu JA, Pearle MS. Assessment of basic endoscopic performance using a virtual reality simulator. J American College of Surgeons 2002; 195:675-681. Shah J, Darzi A. Virtual reality flexible cystoscopy: a validation study. BJU Int 2002; 90:828-832. Adrales GL, Park AE, Chu UB, et al. A valid method of laparoscopic simulation training and competence assessment. J Surg Res 2003; 114:156-162.

Gettman MT, Kondraske GV, Traxer O, et al. Assessment of basic human performance resources predicts operative performance of laparoscopic surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2003; 197:489-496. Gor M, McCloy R, Stone R, Smith A. Virtual reality laparoscopic simulator for assessment in gynaecology. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2003; 110:181-187.

Schijven MP, Jakimowicz J. The learning curve on the Xitact ls 500 laparoscopy simulator: profiles of performance. Surg Endosc 2004; 18:121-127.

McFarlane N, Denstedt J. Imaging and the Internet. J Endourol 2001; 15:59-61. Goldberg MA. Teleradiology and telemedicine. Radiol Clin North Am 1996; 34:647-664. Crump WJ, Pfeil T. A telemedicine primer: an introduction to the technology and an overview of the literature. Arch Family Med 1995; 4:796-803.

Takeda H, Minato K, Takahasi T. High quality image oriented telemedicine with multimedia technology. Int J Med Inform 1999; 55:23-31.

Byrne JP, Mughal MM. Telementoring as an adjunct to training and competence-based assessment in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2000; 14:1159-1161.

Janetschek G, Bartsch G, Kavoussi LR. Transcontinental interactive laparoscopic telesurgery between the United States and Europe. J Urol 1998; 160:1413.

Lee BR, Bishoff JT, Janetschek G, et al. A novel method of surgical instruction: international tele-mentoring. World J Urol 16:367-370.

Lee BR, Caddedu JA, Janetschek G, et al. International surgical telemonitoring: our initial experience. In: Westwood JD, Hoffman HM, Stedney D, Weghorst SJ, eds. Medicine Meets Virtual Reality: Art, Science, Technology: Healthcare (R)Evolution. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1998:41-47. Moore RG, Adams JB, Partin AW, Docimo SG, Kavoussi LR. Telementoring of laparoscopic procedures: initial clinical experience. Surg Endosc 1996; 10:107-110.

Rosser JC Jr, Herman B, Giammaria LE. Telementoring. Semin Laparosc Surg 2003; 10:209-217. Micali S, Vespasiani G, Finazzi-Agro E, et al. Feasibility of telesurgery between Baltimore, USA and Rome, Italy: the first five cases. J Endourol 1999; 13:A145.

Lee BR, Png DJ, Liew L, et al. Laparoscopic telesurgery between the United States and Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2000; 29:665-668.

Link RE, Schulam PG, Kavoussi LR. Telesurgery. Remote monitoring and assistance during laparoscopy. Urol Clin North Am 2001; 28:177-188.

Berguer R, Forkey DL, Smith WD. The effect of laparoscopic instrument working angle on surgeons' upper extremity workload. Surg Endosc 2001; 15:1027-1029.

Berguer R, Rab GT, Abu-Ghaida H, Alarcon A, Chung J. A comparison of surgeons' posture during laparoscopic and open surgical procedures. Surg Endosc 1997; 11:139-142.

Hemal AK, Srinivas M, Charles AR. Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopy. J Endourol 2001; 15:499-503.

Nguyen NT, Ho HS, Smith WD, et al. An ergonomic evaluation of surgeons' axial skeletal and upper extremity movements during laparoscopic and open surgery. Am J Surg 2001; 182:720-724. Herron DM, Gagner M, Kenyon TL, Swanstrom LL. The minimally invasive surgical suite enters the 21st century. A discussion of critical design elements. Surg Endosc (Online) 2001; 15:415-422. Kenyon TA, Urbach DR, Speer JB, et al. Dedicated minimally invasive surgery suites increase operating room efficiency. Surg Endosc 2001; 15:1140-1143.

Aiono S, Gilbert JM, Soin B, Finlay PA, Gordan A. Controlled trial of the introduction of a robotic camera assistant (endoassist) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2002; 16:1267-1270. Gillette JC, Quick NE, Adrales GL, Shapiro R, Park AE. Changes in postural mechanics associated with different types of minimally invasive surgical training exercises. Surg Endosc 2003; 17:259-263.

Kondraske GV, Hamilton EC, Scott DJ, et al. Surgeon workload and motion efficiency with robot and human laparoscopic camera control. Surg Endosc 2002; 16:1523-1527.

Brown SI, Frank TG, El Shallaly G, Cuschieri A. Comparison of conventional and gaze-down imaging in laparoscopic task performance. Surg Endosc 2003; 17:586-590.

Cheah WK, Lenzi JE, So J, Dong F, Kum CK, Goh P. Evaluation of a head-mounted display (HMD) in the performance of a simulated laparoscopic task. Surg Endosc 15:990-991.


0 0

Post a comment